A Secret Weapon For leading case laws of tax practices sec 122 5 a
A Secret Weapon For leading case laws of tax practices sec 122 5 a
Blog Article
“There is no ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any with the present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din saw firstly the deceased and after a ways they observed the petitioners going towards the same direction, didn't indicate that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. This kind of evidence cannot be treated as evidence of last witnessed.
However, In the event the same person were charged with section three hundred and 302, their defence that they never intended to destroy the person – and that They simply needed to injure them or incapacitate them –, will fail, given that the elements from the offence only need the intent to cause injury being proven, not the intention to cause death.
This Court may well interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in the manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the summary or finding reached via the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If your conclusion or finding is for example no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court may perhaps interfere with the conclusion or maybe the finding and mould the relief to make it correct on the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority would be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-appreciate the evidence or perhaps the nature of punishment. To the aforesaid proposition, we've been fortified through the decision of your Supreme Court during the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
The convictions and sentences Upheld, as misappropriation was committed while in the bank and considering the fact that only the appellants were posted within the relevant time .(Criminal Appeal )
long period petitioner wasn't regarded as for promotion, meeting of the departmental promotion committee and think about the petitioner (Promotion)
It allows individuals to research legal issues, understand their rights, and prepare for legal proceedings. This access is particularly important in Pakistan, where legal support is usually highly-priced and tricky to obtain.
ninety six . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It can be very well-settled that when looking at the case of normal promotion of civil servants, the competent authority has got to look at the merit of all of the eligible candidates and after owing deliberations, to grant promotion to this sort of qualified candidates who're found to get most meritorious among them. Since the petitioner was held to get senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was disregarded because of the respondent department just to increase favor towards the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy on the part with the respondent department.
In almost any society, the enforcement of legislation and order is essential to maintain peace and protect its citizens. One of many most really serious crimes that can disrupt this harmony is murder. In Pakistan, Section 302 on the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) deals with the punishment for murder, and its enforcement is very important to guarantee justice prevails.
P.C. Liability of petitioners to the mentioned offences would be determined from the realized trial Court after sifting the evidentiary value with the material generated before the same. Till then, case of
This case is cited in quite a few subsequent judgments, particularly in cases involving constitutional regulation, judicial independence, and the rule of regulation.
Article 199 on the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other satisfactory remedy is provided by legislation." It can be perfectly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust out there remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether Those people remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of more info remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
If your employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC could dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had an opportunity to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC may allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is usually only done When the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. During the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence along with the petitioner company responded to your allegations therefore they were well mindful of the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use to be seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 173 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Though the death penalty is irreversible, life imprisonment allows with the possibility of reconsideration or commutation of the sentence in certain circumstances.